Commentary and Data Analysis by Serge Kernbach:
1.
This is the collective experiment from last Sunday at “10:30—11:00” PST (
05:30PM UTC).
– it is impressive, 37 entries, the community is growing. I see one of goals of such experiments as operator training for remote interactions (e.g. remote healing, ESP and similar with objective feedback provided from devices). It provides a real-world “proof” and “feedback” for the operator.
2.
From skeptical point of view, I would express the null hypothesis – it was no remote impact during “10:30—11:00”. It means two EIS channels at several times points would have similar parameters. For this, two time periods are tested: “10:30—11:00” and “12:30—13:00”. Please take look at “test_null_hypothesis.jpg” and “test_experiment.jpg”. Here we apply the standard statistical “3 sigma rule”: relationship between standard deviations for background and experiment (I equalized background sigmas to have equally scale). We observe equal Psi and curvature at “12:30—13:00” (caused probably by unstable temperature), but very different Psi at “10:30—11:00”. It is more visible in “the_whole_region.jpg”. Thus, we need to accept that some external influence impacted one of channels at “10:30—11:00” and changed it electrochemical properties. We also need to reject the null hypothesis. Congratulation to all with successful experiment.
3.
“3D_whole_region.jpg” – plots differential channel in 3D. You can see equal channels’ dynamics for 2 hours before session that quickly changes after the session. In fact, it provides the same information as 2D images, but more colorful.
April 24, 2019 | 15:37 UTC, Jeremy Pfeiffer says:    
Results are in! Reply